Was Jesus a Unitarian Universalist?

By Rev. Lynn M. Acquafondata

UU Church of the South Hills “Sunnyhill”

April 8, 2007

 

 

            Jesus practiced Jeudaism and Unitarian Universalism didn’t exist back then. But Unitarian Universalism had Christian roots. I wonder, “Does Unitarian Universalism live up to the teachings of Jesus today?”

            In 1841, when Unitarianism and Universalism were still exclusively Christian faiths, Unitarian minister Theodore Parker said that there are only two substantive and lasting parts of Christianity. He said Christianity is about love of human beings and love of God. He went on to describe the “trappings” which are not central and are subject change. In this category he included  the origin and authority of the Bible, as well as the nature and authority of Christ himself.  Parker faced ostracism by all but the most liberal ministers and congregations, but he stood by the truth as he saw it.

            Moving ahead a century and a half, I bring us to John Shelby Spong, a liberal Episcopalean bishop who also focused on the theme of love. In his book Why Christianity Must Change or Die, he talked about how love was used in the Gospel of John as another name for God. He said that Jesus lived and taught a barrier breaking definition of love. We’re talking here about neighborly love, not romantic love, about “unselfish loyal and benevolent concern for the good of another. Even so people at the time limited the definition of one’s neighbor to be only people of one’s family or immediate social group.  

For Jews in Jesus’ time association with gentiles and with the enemy, the Samarians, would make the Jew unclean and therefore separated from his or her community.

            In the teaching about the good Samaritan Jesus explains that acting as a good neighbor is not just about giving a friendly hello to someone in your own social group, and then going about your own business.  Jesus asks people to take risks to take care for one another, even those we view as enemies or those we are afraid of, or those we are uncomfortable with.

            It’s likely that both the priest and Levite were concerned about laws which taught that impurity resulted if you touched a dead or half dead person. They may have had legitimate fears about the possibility of catching disease from this traveler. In this story, the Samaritan not only took his time to bandage the Jewish man’s wounds, he went out of his way to bring the man to an inn and gave his own money for the innkeeper to care for this man he did not know, despite the mutual animosity between his group and the Jews.

With this story, Jesus taught that we must move beyond laws that divide people and fears that hold us back. Good neighbors must be willing give of our own time and money and even risk our own health and sometimes our lives to reach out to others. It means moving into our fears and confronting our prejudices.

            Jesus himself reached out to other people who were considered outcasts at the time. In a scene from the book of Luke, Jesus came near a group of lepers. No one went near lepers at the time. They lived in their own camps of exile because the disease was contagious and uncurable. But Jesus went up to them and cured 10 leper. He didn’t take the credit though. As one leper bowed down to thank him, Jesus said, “Get up and go on your way; you faith has made you well.”   (Luke 17:11-19) It was both Jesus’ love for this man and this man’s faith in God which cured him.

            Let’s think back to Parker and the two essential aspects of Christianity (love of man and love of God) and then think ahead to Unitarian Universalists today. What do we see here?

            The good Samaritan story reminds me of the UU Congregation of Glens Falls, NY the first UU church I belonged to. I think of a gay couple who the congregation invited to speak at a service. The men had sought to adopt children, but the only child social services would allow them to adopt was an infant infected with the AIDS virus who was not expected to live more than a few months.  They had not planned on adopting an AIDS baby, but they longed for a child so much that they agreed to adopt this boy.  With loving care the infant thrived and lived several years bringing great joy and deep sorrow to his fathers.  During that time they adopted a second son who was also infected with HIV at birth. By age seven he was symptom free  Their visit to our church came in the early 1990s when fear of catching AIDS through casual contact still ran high and our society often acted as though homosexuality was a disease that could be caught and spread as well.

            As I heard their story and watched them interact with their son, I could tell that they were wonderful, loving and skilled parents who did something few would dare to do and did it very well. But even more importantly I watched this UU congregation embrace this couple and I saw the boy playing freely with our UU children. We truly welcomed this family and let their love and courage touch us. I knew this would not have happened in any mainstream congregation 15 years ago. This event melted away much of the rigid thinking on same sex couples and disease which I had grown up with.

            Unitarian Universalists have broken the social rules of our society by openly welcoming gay, lesbian, bisexual and trangender people to our congregations including developing a year long process to become officially welcoming of GLBT people which more than half of our congregations including Sunnyhill have gone through.           

            Unitarian Universalism is one of the few religions that sanctions same sex unions and ordains openly Bisexual, Gay, Lesbian, and Transgender people. Unitarian Universalists have advocated across the country for same-sex marriage and civil and legal rights for GLBT people, sometimes putting themselves at risk to do this work.

            This sounds much like the work that Jesus did reaching out beyond stereotype and prejudice to extend neighborly love to others.

            In the Gospel of Mark  (5:1-13) Jesus went to the tombs, the realm of the dead and of social outcasts. He entered the site of the depths of despair of a mentally ill man ostracized by society.  This man had broken multiple restraints then ran among the tombs and up on the mountains hurting himself with stones and howling. Jesus went to the tombs to find this man and heal him. Now it’s said that he healed the man by sending the “unclean spirit” from the ill man into a herd of pigs which led to unpleasant results for the pigs. Either the story is a little off or maybe there is still more we can do to expand the concept and application of love.

            Also in the Gospel of Mark (5:24-34) a woman approached Jesus. This woman suffered from years of hemmoraging. Hemorrhages produced a state of ritual impurity which called for social restriction and exclusion. This woman  reached out and touch Jesus clothes, breaking the barrier imposed on her. Instantly she was healed. In this case it was not an act of Jesus that cured her, but her own ability to reach out and break the taboos of her society.

            Interestingly none of these stories refers to God in any direct way. There are vague references in the phrase “their faith cured them” and the reference of power going out of Jesus as the woman touches Jesus. In that sense you could say a God concept is not central to that aspect of the teachings. However, before the story of the good Samaritan starts, Jesus repeats the central commandment of Jeudism which Parker names as the core tenants of Christianity, to Love the Lord your God with all your heart and your neighbor as yourself. For some UUs this teaching rings true. Love of neighbors follows from love of God. Those of us who embrace both parts of this teaching likely resonate with these words of John Shelby Spong from Why Christianity Must Change or Die. He expresses a religious humanist perspective on the life of Jesus. This description could apply to other views of divinity or higher power besides a traditional God concept simply by substituting another concept for the word God.

            Spong wrote, “Beneath the God claims made for this Jesus was a person who lived a message announcing that there was no status defined by religion, by tribe, by culture, by cult, by ritual, or by illness that could separate any person from the love of God. If love is a part of what God is or who God is, then it can surely be said of this Jesus that he lived the meaning of God. According to the Gospels, he lived it with a consistent intensity.  It was as if his source of love lay beyond every human boundary. It was inexhaustible. It was life giving. Finally, when it was noticed it was thought to be so deeply the meaning of God that the assumption was made that the love present in the life of this Jesus was the result of an external deity who had somehow entered into him.”

            Spong uses a phrase which sums all of this up very well and expresses the essence of Unitarian Universalism for us theists and spiritually oriented people. Spong says that in Jesus “Humanity and divinity flow together”. By following Jesus’ example we strive to do the same with our lives, letting humanity and divinity flow together.

            Some Unitarian Universalists are agnostic or non-theist, making the first part of Jesus teaching connection to God, not applicable to their beliefs. Even Parker’s simple two part statement on the permanent aspects of Christianity clearly leaves non-theists outside this group. (Only UUs would even consider the question of whether non-theists can be Christian.) It is for this reason that both Unitarian in the early 1900s and eventually Universalism moved away from being exclusively Christian traditions.

            However part two of Parker’s assessment, the concept of loving one’s neighbor in the way of Jesus is much clearer for Unitarian Universalists. In the 1800s and early 1900s women led the suffrage movement and gained the right to vote. This included Unitarians like Susan B. Anthony and Universalits like Olympia Brown. Now many women are prominent leaders in our congregations and in the local and national politics and more than 50 percent of our UU ministers in active service are female.

            Most of us long term UUs hardly think about it, but when we enter the doors of any UU congregation we find no stigma based on marital status. People don’t judge each other’s decision regarding divorce and marriage and cohabitation. We are predominately pro-choice which doesn’t mean we encourage abortion. It means that we let people make their own choices and we don’t  judge those choices until we’ve walked in another’s shoes. This openness and acceptance and love despite each other’s imperfections is not the norm in religious institutions around the world. It’s easy to forgot this when we surround ourselves with Unitarian Universalists. It’s why many of us are here in the first place.  

            Unitarian Universalists have gone beyond the confines of our social structure to reach out to others in love over and over again. In fact our UU principles express what it takes to live out love in our lives. To truly follow each one of those principles isn’t easy.

            Around the world, UUs are doing this in various ways. In India, UUs work with outcasts especially women and the those called “untouchables”, India's indigenous peoples, especially migrant, bonded and landless agricultural laborers. Through the Holdeen India program we have worked for more than 20 years to improve conditions. UUs work through funding projects that helped disadvantaged groups in their own efforts to organize, build movements, and demand their rights.

 

            What about us here in this part of the world. How do we or can we live out this teaching on the love of neighbor? How are we in this congregation challenged to continue carrying out this work?

            Jesus asked people to work through our fears and to reach beyond the limits that society imposes on us.

            “In a world with so much hatred and violence,

We need a religion that proclaims the inherent worth and dignity of every person.”[1]

            What if we reached out to drug addicts and alcoholics, even those who have committed crimes? What if we treated people for their addictive illness instead jailing them and then releasing them unchanged back into our midst? What if we encouraged the general population to learn more about mental illness and to find ways of reaching out and including people who act outside what we see as the realm of normality?

“In a world with so much environmental degradation,

We need a religion that advocates respect for the  interdependent web of all existence of which we are a part.”

            What if we continued the work of many UUs in redefining our relationship to the nature world and the animals who inhabit this world with us?

            “In a world with so much brutality and fear,

We need a religion that seeks justice, equity, and compassion in human relations.

In a world with so many persons abused and neglected,

We need a religion that calls us to accept one another and encourage one another to spiritual growth.”[2]

            Who would be considered our enemy today as the Samaritans were considered the enemy in Jesus’s day. What would it look like if we reached out in some way to the most hated of all people in the today’s world?  Terrorists. We are told to fear and avoid terrorists and above all not to interact and negotiate with them. Is there a way to express Jesus barrier breaking love in these situations? Hostile confrontation has exacerbated problems around the world today, whereas peaceful negotiation tends to have different results.

            How far do we go to reach out to enemies? Does it go more than one way? I don’t have easy answers, but I do believe Jesus’ teaching calls us to stretch out thinking and our actions in ways we have not yet imagined. Of course it’s dangerous work.  It was in Jesus’ day too.

            Even if we don’t go quite that far, what might this kind of love mean for you in your personal life? Who do you truly welcome in your life? Can you reach out in love your personal enemies? Or to those you disagree with? Can you strive to see the world from another’s perspective?

            What healthy limits can help us to live out the important values of our lives? What lines of responsibility are necessary to balance our freedom with the freedom of others? Allowing oneself to be subjected to abuse is not the barrier breaking love that Jesus encouraged. Instead walking away from abuse might that kind of love, especially in cases in which society expects a woman to stick by her husband or a child to honor his or her parents.

            In the last supper Jesus said he gave his blood for us. Blood is a symbol of spirit. He gave his spirit and he gave his body for us. How do we give of our bodies and our spirit for others?

            We can live out Jesus’ Easter message by letting go of any limiting concepts of love and letting those barriers die. We can live out Jesus’ message by moving beyond our comfort zones, by letting ourselves find and live out new affirming patterns of understanding. We can live out his teaching by living out UU principles as we reach out in love to others.

 

 

 



[1] From “Affirmation” by Scott W. Alexander, done as a responsive reading

[2] From “Affirmation” by Scott W. Alexander, done as a responsive read